Well, Peter JAckson does it best when it's either very serious and high budget, or totally b grade crack humour. I doubt it's crack humour like Bad Taste so I'm thinking that the movie might just take it's self too seriously. I hope they have lighter moments in it. Tintin was very swash buckler, light hearted with adventure in it more than action. I hope that having it in CGI doesn't tempt them too much into making it unrealistic eventwise. IT's forgivable in 2D, but not in 3D. It has some BIG names producing it though so it'll be big in some way. IT's whether it's true to Tintin or not, not whether it'll be worth watching. It'll be worth watching even if it's not true Tintin.

As I said, I'll see what I think of it.